The Apparent Transaction
The registered transaction may appear to be a sale, lifetime care arrangement or another agreement. The initial review seeks to understand whether the registered transaction corresponds with the actual course of events.
Not every transfer registered as a sale amounts to a collusive inheritance transfer. We examine the title chain, payment documents and family relationships and explain the grounds for your claim, potential defences and missing evidence in writing. To start, briefly provide the known transfer date and any title information.
The review is a paid service. We state its scope, fee and delivery timetable in writing before work begins.
A collusive inheritance transfer claim cannot be assessed solely on the thought that ‘I should have inherited’. The genuine economic consideration for the registered sale, the buyer's ability to pay, the deceased's circumstances on the transaction date, family relationships and subsequent use are examined together.
The legal basis of the claim depends on the transaction's nature. If the matter does not involve a collusive inheritance transfer, other routes such as reduction, identification of the estate, cancellation and registration of title or estate partition may arise.
If the property risks being transferred to a third party during proceedings, an interim injunction should also be considered from the outset. This does not guarantee the litigation outcome but makes the file's need for temporary legal protection visible.
Title records, payment documents and transaction circumstances are read together to identify the evidence supporting the allegation.
A collusive inheritance transfer arises where the deceased transfers registered immovable property that they actually intend to give away, disguising it as a sale or lifetime care agreement to deprive an heir of inheritance rights. The Court of Cassation's Unification of Judgments Decision of 01.04.1974, file 1974/1 and decision 1974/2, is the fundamental precedent. A low price or an intra-family transfer alone is insufficient; actual intent and evidence are assessed together. Court of Cassation decision on application of the precedent.
The registered transaction may appear to be a sale, lifetime care arrangement or another agreement. The initial review seeks to understand whether the registered transaction corresponds with the actual course of events.
The central question is whether the transaction genuinely intended a sale or sought to exclude some heirs from their inheritance rights.
Collusion is assessed through title records, payment documents, witness accounts, financial circumstances and the ordinary course of events, rather than family opinion alone.
The classic assessment of collusive inheritance transfers generally concerns transfers of registered immovable property. Different remedies may arise for company shares, bank accounts, money transfers, unregistered immovable property or other assets. Depending on the file, therefore, reduction proceedings, identification of estate assets or cancellation and registration of title must be considered separately. If a transfer to a third party is at risk, an interim injunction must also be considered separately.
Constructing only the heir's allegation is insufficient in a collusive inheritance transfer case. The other party's possible defences concerning a genuine sale, care relationship, payment, balance within the family or the deceased's actual needs should be anticipated from the outset.
The other party may allege that the registered transaction was a genuine sale, the price was paid or payment was made in cash.
It may be argued that the deceased needed care, the transfer was not gratuitous or there was a reasonable economic explanation at the time.
If the property was transferred again, good faith, the ownership chain and absence of an injunction may affect the proceedings.
The appropriate route is determined by reading the economic and family circumstances at the transaction date, current title position and third-party transfer risk together, rather than by title records alone.
Transfer date, transaction type, sale price, parties and subsequent ownership changes are examined together.
Whether the buyer had the financial means genuinely to purchase the property is assessed.
The difference between the registered price and the property's actual value at the time may matter for the file.
The relationship between the deceased and transferee, care, cohabitation, balance within the family and history of inheritance distribution are examined.
Witnesses, correspondence, bank records, official documents and information on actual use are assessed together.
Whether the property has been or may be transferred again and allegations of good faith are assessed separately.
Where a suspicious title transfer involves a risk that the property will change hands during proceedings, the need for temporary protection is assessed separately.
Alongside the general rule, cadastral matters, party capacity, jurisdiction and special statutory circumstances are examined separately.
The effect of potential cancellation or registration on partition, reserved shares and other heirs is addressed together.
If an injunction is sought, possible security, the scope of the request and its effect on the other party are assessed for the particular file.
Genuine sale, care, debt repayment, cash payment and other defences are tested against documents and the ordinary course of events.
Heirs abroad may require separate planning for powers of attorney, apostilles, translations and obtaining documents.
You receive a reasoned written assessment of the title transfer, records and evidence to complete, and recommended next steps. If proceedings are ongoing, we separately define which questions in the existing file will be examined.
Title records, transfer date, transaction type, certificate of inheritance, will, banking movements, current ownership and available correspondence are classified.
Strong and weak evidence, likely defences, time limits, procedure, third-party transfers and injunction risks are made visible for the particular file.
Depending on the file, cancellation and registration of title, reduction, identification of estate assets, an injunction or completion of documents are considered.
Briefly provide the transfer date, property and question you want clarified. We will agree the scope and timing of the paid review in writing before work begins.