Legal Insights — EN

Can a Claim Be Brought over a Home Transferred under a Lifetime Care Agreement?

A transfer for care is not always a gift or sham transaction. The agreement’s form, actual purpose and evidence of performance are examined together.
A house model and transfer file linked to a bedside lamp by a linen support loop

A Deceased Person’s Sham Transaction

A Deceased Person’s Sham Transaction

Prepared by:

A claim may be possible, but neither the word “care” in the agreement’s title nor a transfer to an heir determines the outcome alone. A lifetime care agreement is a statutory contract involving reciprocal performance. A transfer in return for genuine care differs from a transaction alleged to conceal a gift. Without this distinction, every transfer for care cannot be called a deceased person’s sham transaction.

We first examine the entire agreement, the type of land registry transaction and the formal requirements. The law imposes special requirements for executing this agreement. The parties’ actual purpose, care needs, care actually provided and scope of performance are also investigated through evidence. Alleged non-performance and an allegation that the transaction concealed a different purpose from the outset do not raise the same legal question; claims and parties may vary accordingly.

Preparation requires the agreement, title transaction documents, records of health and living conditions, care expenses and witness information. A clear chronology should explain who lived where in each period and who provided care. An age difference, property value or other heirs’ dissatisfaction alone does not establish a sufficient conclusion. Payment and care evidence presented by the opposing party is also assessed together.

Legal Grounds

TBK m. 611–612; the reciprocal performance and form of a care agreement are examined separately from an allegation of simulation.