Extinguishment of Obligations

Obligations and Debt Claims
Prepared by: Constantinople
Debt Claims
An allegation that an obligation has ended must identify the ground relied on. Payment, release, set-off, novation, and impossibility have different conditions. Limitation is not treated in the same way as extinguishment; the defence's nature requires separate assessment.
The Whole Relationship or a Single Claim?
Paying one invoice under a long-term contract may not terminate the entire contract. Conversely, accrued claims may continue after the relationship ends. The fate of the principal obligation, interest, security, and ancillary rights must be examined separately. A statement that an account is closed must be identified as a payment record, release, or settlement.
Documented Extinguishment
Performance provisions must be assessed alongside Articles 131 et seq. of the Turkish Code of Obligations. Return of an instrument, a receipt, or bank record may matter, but each must be read within its scope. A partial payment requires identification of the remaining debt. Where several debts exist between the same parties, dates and explanations must be retained to avoid disputes over which debt ended.
Where Proceedings Are Pending
The effect of later payment or agreement on a pending file must be addressed procedurally. Even if the claim ended, costs and interest may need separate determination. We compare the alleged extinguishment with its grounds, showing in writing rights concluded, claims remaining, and necessary procedural steps.
Documents That May Be Prepared for the Initial Review
- Receipts, transfer records, and account reconciliations
- Release and settlement documents
- Debt instruments
- Pending enforcement and litigation records
File review and representation are paid services. Scope and fees are agreed in writing before work begins.
Legal Grounds
Turkish Code of Obligations, Articles 83–104, 131–145
Last content review: 11 November 2026.