Acknowledgment of Debt

Documenting Claims and Evidence
Prepared by: Constantinople
Debt Claims
The other party's acknowledgment may matter, but the debt and amount acknowledged must be identified. A general promise to pay and an express acknowledgment may not carry the same evidentiary weight. The document's form, signature, and execution circumstances must be assessed together.
The Scope of Acknowledgment
Article 18 of the Turkish Code of Obligations regulates validity of acknowledgment without stating the debt's cause. Such a document does not, however, eliminate every dispute. Clarity of amount, parties, maturity, and related transaction matters. The debtor suggesting a discussion of accounts does not invariably establish an agreed definite debt amount.
Electronic Acknowledgment and Time Limits
Acknowledgment in a message or email may be assessed as evidence and for interruption of limitation. The sender's identity, authority, and full context must be preserved. Part payment or interest payment may also matter as acknowledgment. Not every discussion or negotiation message has the same effect. The claim component covered must be identified separately.
When Preparing a New Text
Before signing a payment plan or reconciliation, clarify whether the old debt is extinguished and replaced. Suretyship, security, interest, and earlier objections must be addressed carefully. We examine the effect of existing acknowledgments and the new text together, identifying documents and dates still required for collection.
Documents That May Be Prepared for the Initial Review
- The complete acknowledgment text
- Signature or sender records
- The original debt documents
- Partial-payment and interest receipts
File review and representation are paid services. Scope and fees are agreed in writing before work begins.
Legal Grounds
Turkish Code of Obligations, Articles 18, 154
Last content review: 11 November 2026.